Leet (often written as 1337 or l33t) is an internet-born writing style where standard letters are replaced with numbers or symbols that look similar. Originating in the 1980s among early computer hackers and gamers, it was used to bypass text filters and demonstrate membership in an elite (hence the name) digital community.
Cerberus leetspeak is a language-tool used to pry open the perception.to pierce through the veil of Lethe. to perceive the three heads of Cerberus [specific] beyond seeing the body of Cerberus – the disenchantment1 [general].
as we’ve covered in preceding posts, the general disenchantment is what people are talking about: ecological crisis, economic collapse, the meaning crisis, ‘late stage capitalism’, ‘devices’, mental health crisis, ‘metacrisis’, disembodiment and trauma, educational collapse, gender politics, ‘replication crisis’, disinformation and misinformation, ‘techno-feudalism’, and so on.
originating in underground bulletin board systems – precursors to the Internet – in the 1980s . ‘leetspeak’2 is a linguistic phenomena in which certain characters of a word are replaced with numbers or glyphs.
A glyph is a symbolic mark, carving, or visual character that communicates information. The term comes from the Greek word glyphein, meaning “to carve”.
Cerberus leetspeak is a modification of the existing leet.
one
that has
a very limited
number of glyph
swapping possibilities: only three glyphs are used.
the limited number
in no way diminishes
the potency of the tool.
nor its ability to reveal hidden depths of the triadic *aesthetic* current created by Cerberus penchant for the mechanization of vital currents within all fields of human inquiry and endeavor. especially those linked to the body and transformation of human potential.
the three glyphs uses are ‘1’, ‘2’ and ‘3’.
each signifies the qualities
and properties of the three
Heads of Cerberus corrupting
a stream or act of creation in line
w the properties of that head.
Cerberus leetspeak is an important tool within the *relativity* toolbox. it enhances the properties – and itself is enhanced – when combined with: the parallax diagrams; tells; Daedalus’ Blade principles; ‘DR9’ technologies and links w umbral analysis in the decipherment of the ‘confusion of tongues’, and so on3.
one of the other language-tools
that the leetspeak augments
well with are ‘babel-signs’.
[*] Cerberus ‘babel-signs’ [ cerberi confusio linguarum ]
this term describes not confusion between languages – but the ‘confusion of tongues’ within the same language4. by people of different heads and different densities of head of Cerberus. people of different chemistry. these are often special words; or more accurately: words with special properties for unveiling the habit structure and anatomy of machination of Cerberus.
classic examples of babel-signs are: ‘mind’, ‘alchemy’, ‘life’, ‘yoga’, ‘consciousness’, ‘conscious’, ‘body’, ‘language’, ‘science’, et fucken al5.
what people consider to be ‘conscious’, psychologically, is actually *unconscious* – when viewed from a different vantage. though it still may be ‘conscious’ biologically|medically [ie not ‘knocked out’; ‘delirious’, etc].
when we see someone who is aware of their surroundings; even aware of their thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations – but have Cerberus visibly possessing their body – they are unconscious in a particular alchemical sense6.
the same is true with the hydroponic extraction of the babel-sign ‘mindfulness’ from its dharmic roots.
particularly amusing and illustrative is its migration|contagion into the sphere of the body. where and whence it descends a few extra rungs of vitality into ‘mindful movement’.
if someone puts themself out their as a practitioner of ‘mindful movement’ and you can perceive Cerberus within their organism [and they are unaware of this]; and|or speech|conception|ideation is permeated by it – then not only are they deceiving themselves [and others]; they are also giving off Cerberus anatomical information.
C3rberus is usually the ‘innovat3r’; who’s theft, descent and disenchantment of materia from living traditions creates the initial unsparking where we see phenomena that are explainable by the leet glyph ‘3’7.
in this example: many of the mindfulness and body combining methods were|are ‘m3ndful movement’. as this blending has now existed for so long – become saturated – we also get secondary colourings from the other two heads of Cerberus [‘m2ndful movement’, ‘m1ndful movement’]. these are obvious. anyone taken by these obviousnesses is not worth listening to on these topics.
before you read too much into this: mindful movement – a body that is totally present and in motion and incarnate – is a virtuous possibility and a worthy actuality8.
it just isn’t likely to be occurring in one who pawns ‘mindfulness’; or prattles metaphysics spliced w Cerberus. and it isn’t a duality of yes|no, either. there is a whole spectrum9.
if|when you see people blending neuroscience rationale for meditation|mindfulness w body|‘somatic’|psychological methodology – you are almost always witnessing a Cerberus event10.
no one who has the fruits of contemplative practice, meditation and body praxis need bring neuroscience into the equation. it betrays a lack of Cerberus|disenchantment literacy to do so in the illusion-cubed period [and the some preceding junctures]11.
in the illusion-cubed era [this era] it is more likely that someone whom never mentions ‘mindfulness’ or ‘meditation’ or its combinatrix w movement will be in possession of the actuality of mindful movement, than one who does. especially if the mentioning is copious. secular embodied apophatics is democracy, manifest12.
pivoting back to the initial babel-sign dissectional – ‘conscious’ – recently, we can witness an increase of psychological terminological and conceptual drift into the sphere of the body13. we can see a licorice all sorts of talk about body methods and ‘shadow work’, ‘reprogramming the subconscious’, smudging conception of Jungian ‘collective unconscious’ and adjacent themes into the landscape. et fucken al.
‘subconscious’, etymologically speaking, evokes hidden influences that are ‘below’, ‘under’, ‘beneath’ the conscious order of perception of the individual [or collective]. but it is too general a sentiment. and does not include elements ‘below the below’ [subsubconsicous]. nor consider that their might be active forces; ‘creatures’, swimming in these subterranean streams.
‘collective unconscious’ is equally general; as it groups mechanical aspects of Number [enneagramatics], Shape [Cerberus] – with livingaspects of myth, symbol, and essence together14. whereas in actuality, these elements are of totally different dimensions and charges. again presence and absence can be seen in the body – but also in the words they use, concepts and ideas they debate, their timing [or lack thereof], and so on; and so forth.
there are forces actively seeking to prevent the person and the collective from perceptions of different orders. others are passively or neutrally preventing. some are just neutral. and some are actively aiding – seeking to wake the essence from its slumber in matter.
the afflicting forces also work differently in the individual; the subculture; civilisation or paradigm. but share a bonding modus operandi. study on this15.
Continue reading immediately on Dave’s substack here.
(Or wait until next week.)
Feature photo: album cover of Bon Iver 22, A Million