what is encompassed within the totality of the discourse on ‘the disenchantment’, within Physical Alchemy is viewed as the general aspects [the body of Cerberus].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet

see ‘Cerberus: allegory of the disenchantment’ paid essay on this Substack for further on these terminologies.

this is categorically not the same as simply ‘not understanding’ a word. or not understanding its ‘nuac3d’, ‘compl3x’ or ‘probl3matic’ heritage, history, or usage.

in fact and indeed – seeing c3rberus trying to police language and to ‘educ3te’ [in their perspective] either lesser intelligence and|or less learned c3rberus [usually with different political views than their own]; or more commonly C2rberus and C1rberus afflicted beings – is illustrative of the confusion of tongues are the babel-signs.

c3 always thinks they understand the word totally and in all possible contexts [and are agitated by other beings perceived incorrect usage or ‘misinformation’]. but for most babel-signs there is triangularperceptions that resolve the confusion of tongues. but these would require one to perceive Cerberus and other things – which by the above language behaviours we can tell is absent at the time of the action. if we look at those trying to clean up knowledge and understanding on the internet, they usually fall into the white work phase of c3rberus; which means they cannot see the red work babel-sign interactions for their own head, or the other two heads. let alone being able to have a eagle eye view of what is happening around the sign [why and when it exists].

as mentioned in previous works: observing c3 performing these behaviors is evidence for the study of Cerberus. and now – after introducing the leetspeak – there can be enhanced precision in which we gather these anatomical observations.

in close to 100% of incidence of these terms within popular mediums [and unpopular, too] you are witnessing a Cerberus event. take note.

especially if they pontificate with neurological, psychological, or philosophical reasoning; ‘debate’, and arguing for their being ‘conscious’. or ‘what is conscious?!’ or any type of squirm-squirt word-mentation issuing forth from an unalchemical body.

similarly if you hear ‘hard problem of consciousness’ it is normally a c3 tell and defence mechanism.

mechanical syncretism is not the only fallen genesis of living materia; C3rberus often ‘creat3s’ materia from the frankensteinian stitching of dead materia. particularly if it is the cogent dead. the nuanced dead. the clever utopia centrist survey of a problematic issue, dead. the clever dead.

and yes; walking meditations such as kinhin, or other moving meditations do exist. Cerberus will instantly take the mental centre to such when reading this paragraph: to ‘dispute’, ‘discourse’, ‘debate’, ‘critique’, and so on.

this ‘mechanical mindfulness’ ie the varietal of false selves ensnared by talking and thinking about the spiritual technologies that can be their undoing, is nothing new. the particular virulence of it within this age, is. but it is also good study materia.

and it isn’t ‘the phones’ or computers. though these can be amplifiers. I saw a skit recently by a comedian roughly my age, suggesting that people of our era naturally were doing ‘mindfulness’ because there were no phones|devices. this isn’t so. we had the innate device of the brain to stop us being present. thought and imagination are the OG doomscroll.

and humorously – it is a ‘metaphysical colonisation’ event [given some of the people displaying these traits, are also ‘anti-colonialist’ in their rhetoric]. similar to extraction of psychoactive molecules from sacred plants.

consider: there are instances in the records of between 10-20 practitioners attaining the Circle in ages preceding the scientific revolution by hundreds of years. material [square] progress does not equate to progress of alchemical [triangular] or spiritual [circular] events. in fact one could argue it blocks these.

but what is metameta about this is that technologies of the square [matter] proliferating, actual allow one to see the ‘cl3verness binding the soul’ aspects more clearly than ever.

attempted counter-spells have a very specific when around them.

sometimes with an ‘anti-mindfulness’, ‘anti-buddhist’, or ‘anti-meditational’ backlash; which itself is a Cerberus sign and part of the disenchanting current within the sphere of the body. spengelian modifiers amplify this dramatically. this is evidence.

and does not give shamanistic traditions there due respect. relegates them to the second or tertiary division of ‘superstitious proto therapy’ – or worse ‘psychot3chnoligies’. anything to not see them as immense spiritual reservoirs from before Cerberus’s extantedness. cast your gaze over the sepia and black & white photos taken of the indigenous americans. then look at the LinkedIn photos of psychologists; or their podcasts on mute. [….]. essence speaks from silence. c3rberus prattles and discourses and debates and ‘innovates’. C2rberus grifts and ‘hacks’.

but don’t post on the study of it – or you are it. [arcane-o-botics 101.]

see ‘notes to a young physical alchemist’ paid essay on this Substack for further on this.

invested within the Law of 7. but we never say this. there are legions of 20-something arcane-o-bot influencers ‘disseminating the hidden truths of the ages’ out there, at present. just as those whom wrote books on these topics in the 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s did. let them. this is evidence. in a world where anyone can say anything, what one purposefully does not speak on shows what others cannot-not speak on. this is Cerberus. this is a veil. ‘Cannot-notness’ is evidence. but there’s also issues of when. sometimes, certain people have to speak at certain junctures. have to share the work of others in the same sphere as their craft. to not do so is the tail side of the disenchanted coin, for which the head side is a prattler.

adding in ‘sybau medicinals’ for c3 to proceed from underunderstanding to gnowledge [in most cases].

Charybdis mutations [see Forging the body anew essay] produce some of the most humourous reactions to this, as they automatically assume they are outside of Cerberus. this is particularly amusing if they themselves are using gurdjieffian materia in their experimentation; and|or have activated any of the h3x3njäger mutations. some of the fine grade anatomy for Charybdis comes from the study of false enchanter patterns – whom are always trying to control and police information outside of the Square; which for them is impossible due the strength of the bonds created in forming mutation patterns + the fact the veil of Cerberus prevents this. nevertheless the won’t stop trying, hence the anatomy.

beyond the usage of ‘4’ and above; even the usage of ‘1’, ‘2’, ‘3’ is a tell for people bound by Cerberus. this is because they are trying to show, to educate about Cerberus, whilst still being bound within its gravity. one should entertain that Cerberus leetspeak should be for personal usage for at least the first seven years after encountering it.